by Crumplezone » Tue Apr 15, 2014 7:52 pm
Software piracy has been around a very long time and its even more prevalent these days with the digital era were in.
To tackle piracy is no small measure as the most determined pirates will set get content regardless of what anyone will do, but there are ways to deal with it and with 3rd party developers they have a few options.
Just trains has a fairly decent system in which they require a unlock of the software once its been downloaded and its also account based so someone download JT content for example would have to A. have a account with just trains B. access a buyers account C. have the code from there site.
Rar files can be password locked which can also prevent all but the most determined in getting into the files.
At the end of the day however, none of the big firms or small 3rd party is free of piracy. Steam isn't safe from piracy and people have already found ways around running games which are downloaded through steam and run without the requirement of steam being present to run them (which by default steam games do require).
The thing is, if you involve alot of DRM it can also have a negative effect on customer and userbase. Alot of people disagree with having multiple different types of DRM just to get to content they have purchased these days and there used to be quite a big one back a few years ago which installed with games which in turn ended up actually breaking some people's disc drives due to it.
What I suggest is if you see these type of posts, you inform the owners immediately and privately and let them deal with it in there own way and as a point for 3rd party developers, if your users are loyal they will end up telling you someone is trying to pirate your content and pass the information onto you.
I'm a funny sort mind, I also consider digging out links to downloads on payware/freeware sites and linking the direct download as a form of piracy and I had brought this up with AP once on his own facebook page to be shot down people because "the content was free". The whole concept that devouring vast amounts of bandwidth from the owner, hence costing money and also not directly having people visit the site thus not providing ad/site hit revenue was completely devoid on the people, they just wanted the free content. Ofcourse this got resolved and the thread in question on UKTS was also closed but it annoys me at times when people think because its free from them it doesn't matter if you offer direct links to content. In AP's case, the links if 100 people had downloaded all the content at the same time or over a hour period would have run up 50gigs of bandwidth.
Now that might seem small to some people, however for a small firm that is a heck of lot of bandwidth used up suddenly.
Unfortunately, piracy at the end of the day is one of the lesser evils we have to deal with, I think people diliberately inserting keyloggers or malware into original downloads then redistributing them is alot worse.